Автор: Кирил
Дата: 10-04-07 00:30
Ето едно мнение за апаратчето от pascal16 в dpreview - http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1001&thread=22580275
цитат:
Buy it yesterday, 300 shots taken, lot of macros, first impression :
S850 is good for :
- good and fast focusing (assist lamp in the dark, fast on macro etc..)
- good macro mode (min = 2.3cm wide)
- powefull flash
- sreen is visible even a sunny day
- very silent zooming
- smooth zooming control
- fast power up ( a bit longuer if flash is on)
- very good autonomy (with Hybrio 2100mAh AA sized bat, more that 300 pics + some videos with editing and deleting )
- MPEG4 movies, you don't need to compress it later
- good hi iso (iso 400 is fabulous, good NR, iso 800 and 1600 are a bit noisy but sharp, iso 50-100-200 are a bit blurry due to NR)
- high apperture
- some funny function like adding borders.
S850 is middle for
- the screen overxepose white areas, you always think that it is hilight clipping, but the shot is ok on pc screen.
- if zoom is at max extension, the power down is a bit long
- auto macro works only on AUTO mode, not P mode
- lack of some more button to have a direct acces to manual function (especialy manual focussing)
- no zoom of the center of the preview while manual focusing
- lanscape are not as sharp as I espected (maybe too much noise reduction)
- no real anti shake system (AS)
- tele macro mode (it gives a 10cm wide image at 40cm, but without AS, normal macro mode is better)
- no wide angle
- no auto AF on movies
- Zooming is working in movie mode, but the focus is set at the first frame, not later. I don't manage to force it by pausing and restarting.
- a bit too high, a bit too large, a bit too deep, a bit too heavy (200gr with battery and card, R5 is 175 with battery and card)
- self portrait with flash is a bit overexpode (not too much, just a little)
S850 is bad for
- nothing is bad enough that I don't recommand it
Something about apperture :
You can have a sharper image if you don't use f/2.8 and min aperture.
f/2.8 is a bit soften, it's normal.
f/max is a bit soften too, this time, it seems to be the thinkness of the diaphragm hole that gives a little more difraction, like with all other compact cameras.
|
|
![[smilie8]](https://photo-forum.net/forum/smileys/smilie8.gif)
![[smilie7]](https://photo-forum.net/forum/smileys/smilie7.gif)
![[smilie24]](https://photo-forum.net/forum/smileys/smiley24.gif)
![[smilie5]](https://photo-forum.net/forum/smileys/smilie5.gif)
![[smilie10]](https://photo-forum.net/forum/smileys/smilie10.gif)
Бони този модел "изключение от правилото ли е" или има и друга сапунера на Самсунг с подобен приличен обектив![[smilie2]](https://photo-forum.net/forum/smileys/smilie2.gif)
![[beer]](https://photo-forum.net/forum/smileys/smiley20.gif)
![[smilie3]](https://photo-forum.net/forum/smileys/smilie3.gif)
Днес си го закупих и първите ми впечатления са отлични. Не съм специалист и трудно мога да преценя доколко добре се справя, но ясно мога да видя предимствата спрямо предишната "сапунерка". Не мисля, че има проблеми с фокусирането, а снимките с ISO400 ме впечатляват. По късно ще постна някои снимки, но ако обясните как да направя определен тест, ще е по-добре. За мен S850 е едно добро решение за апарат в рамките на 300-450лв. Панасоник TZ1 също ми хареса много, но с тая LiI батерия 1Ah, която може да изчезне след две-три години- и струва повече от 10%от цената на апарата... На Канон-а не ми хареса цената в България просто...
![[shtrak]](https://photo-forum.net/forum/smileys/shtrak.gif)
Стани фен на Фото Форум във Facebook
Фото Форум в Instagram